Hawkins v. Kinlaw

Fourth Circuit

Hawkins v. Kinlaw

621 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2015·No. No. 15-6976·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hawkins v. Kinlaw, 621 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

621 F. App'x 208 (Hawkins v. Kinlaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related