Hawkins v. Joseph

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hawkins v. Joseph

709 So. 2d 296, 97 La.App. 3 Cir. 1292, 1998 La. App. LEXIS 384, 1998 WL 100415

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 6, 1998·No. No. 97-1292·Published

Opinion

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Hawkins v. City of Jennings, 97-1291 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), 709 So.2d 292, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part. Costs of this appeal are assigned fifty percent to the plaintiff and fifty percent to the defendants in the above-cited consolidated opinion.

[297]*297AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Hawkins v. City of Jennings, 97-1291 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), 709 So.2d 292, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part. Costs of this appeal are assigned fifty percent to the plaintiff and fifty percent to the defendants in the above-cited consolidated opinion.

[297]*297AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

Hawkins v. Joseph, 709 So. 2d 296, 97 La.App. 3 Cir. 1292, 1998 La. App. LEXIS 384, 1998 WL 100415 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

709 So. 2d 296 (Hawkins v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related