Hawkins v. Hawkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hawkins v. Hawkins

823 S.W.2d 27, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1991·No. Nos. 58662, 58716·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband and wife both appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution decree. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband and wife both appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution decree. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Hawkins v. Hawkins, 823 S.W.2d 27, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 27 (Hawkins v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related