Hawkins v. Hawkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hawkins v. Hawkins

109 So. 3d 277, 2013 WL 709790, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3218

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 2013

DocketNo. 1D12-2539

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 277 (Hawkins v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Hawkins, 109 So. 3d 277, 2013 WL 709790, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former husband raises nineteen issues for review, challenging two orders of the trial court in this dissolution of marriage action. We affirm these orders in all respects, except as to the credit awarded the former "wife in the Order Determining [278]*278Proportionate Share of Expenses. The former wife concedes that each party is responsible for one half of the total expenses and that, as such, her credit in this order should be $17,211.86, rather than the $34,423.71 the trial court credited her in the order. Therefore, we reverse and remand for correction of this amount and we otherwise affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former husband raises nineteen issues for review, challenging two orders of the trial court in this dissolution of marriage action. We affirm these orders in all respects, except as to the credit awarded the former "wife in the Order Determining [278]*278Proportionate Share of Expenses. The former wife concedes that each party is responsible for one half of the total expenses and that, as such, her credit in this order should be $17,211.86, rather than the $34,423.71 the trial court credited her in the order. Therefore, we reverse and remand for correction of this amount and we otherwise affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 3d 277, 2013 WL 709790, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-hawkins-fladistctapp-2013.