Hawkins v. Haney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hawkins v. Haney

1 White & W. 395

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1879·No. No. 452, Tex. L. J., vol. 2, p. 477·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 723. Judgment by default; effect of, as an admission. Whilst a default may be an implied admission of all the definite issuable facts well pleaded by the plaintiff in his petition, it will hardly be contended that the default admits anything further. [Johnson v. Stallcup, 41 Tex. 529.] We are of opinion that there is no allegation in the original or amended petition which would, if taken as true, warrant a personal judgment against the plaintiff in error for the amount of the account sued on, the suit being to recover an account by a sub-contractor and to fix a building lien on a house and lot in the city of Dallas. [Waldroff v. Scott, 46 Tex. 1; Gaylord v. Loughridge, 50 Tex. 573, and Huck v. Gaylord, 50 Tex. 578.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 723. Judgment by default; effect of, as an admission. Whilst a default may be an implied admission of all the definite issuable facts well pleaded by the plaintiff in his petition, it will hardly be contended that the default admits anything further. [Johnson v. Stallcup, 41 Tex. 529.] We are of opinion that there is no allegation in the original or amended petition which would, if taken as true, warrant a personal judgment against the plaintiff in error for the amount of the account sued on, the suit being to recover an account by a sub-contractor and to fix a building lien on a house and lot in the city of Dallas. [Waldroff v. Scott, 46 Tex. 1; Gaylord v. Loughridge, 50 Tex. 573, and Huck v. Gaylord, 50 Tex. 578.]

Reversed and remanded.

Hawkins v. Haney, 1 White & W. 395 (Tex. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

1 White & W. 395 (Hawkins v. Haney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related