Hawkins v. Hale

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7168

MAURICE HAWKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUTH HALE, Commonwealth of Virginia Chief Magistrate,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-05-217-GEC-MFU)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Maurice Hawkins appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hawkins v. Hale, No. CA-05-217-GEC-MFU (W.D.

Va. April 13, 2005, July 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -