Hawkins v. Fuller
This text of 29 N.W. 92 (Hawkins v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When an appeal is had from the clerk to the circuit court from taxation of costs, the case should' not be remanded to the clerk for new action, but the taxation should be made by-the court.
The order made in this case setting aside the old taxation, and remanding the case for a new one, must be vacated, and the costs must be taxed by the court, and a mandamus issued accordingly.
The execution levy must not be disturbed, but; in case it should turn out that the taxation is reduced, the amount of the reduction may be indorsed on the execution.
As we have not all the papers, it is possible there may be occasion for some reduction, but we are unable to fix it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 N.W. 92, 62 Mich. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-fuller-mich-1886.