Hawkins v. Fuller

29 N.W. 92, 62 Mich. 531
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

When an appeal is had from the clerk to the circuit court from taxation of costs, the case should' not be remanded to the clerk for new action, but the taxation should be made by-the court.

The order made in this case setting aside the old taxation, and remanding the case for a new one, must be vacated, and the costs must be taxed by the court, and a mandamus issued accordingly.

The execution levy must not be disturbed, but; in case it should turn out that the taxation is reduced, the amount of the reduction may be indorsed on the execution.

As we have not all the papers, it is possible there may be occasion for some reduction, but we are unable to fix it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins v. Fuller, 29 N.W. 92, 62 Mich. 531 (Mich. 1886).

29 N.W. 92 (Hawkins v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Niblock v. Saginaw Circuit Judge
153 N.W. 773 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)