Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

26 S.E.2d 901, 223 N.C. 858

DecidedSeptember 29, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.E.2d 901 (Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 26 S.E.2d 901, 223 N.C. 858 (N.C. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 S.E.2d 901, 223 N.C. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-federal-land-bank-of-columbia-nc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack