Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia
26 S.E.2d 901, 223 N.C. 858
Opinion
This case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 26 S.E.2d 901, 223 N.C. 858 (N.C. 1943).
26 S.E.2d 901 (Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank
18 S.E.2d 823 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)