Hawkins v. Darby

163 S.E. 307, 44 Ga. App. 791, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 515
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket22051
StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 307 (Hawkins v. Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. Darby, 163 S.E. 307, 44 Ga. App. 791, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A verdict and judgment were awarded in favor of Lelia Darby against Hawkins Brothers, composed of Carroll Hawkins, Burén Hawkins and Bernice Hawkins. A motion for a new trial on the usual general grounds was made by Carroll Hawkins, and was overruled, and exceptions were taken. The case comes within the rule laid down in Copeland v. State, 41 Ga. App. 567 (153 S. E. 609), wherein this court declined to interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial judge in overruling a motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Copeland v. State
153 S.E. 609 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 307, 44 Ga. App. 791, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-darby-gactapp-1932.