Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hawkins v. Daniels

Hawkins v. Daniels

838 So. 2d 618, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 2003 WL 367084
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-4821
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 618 (Hawkins v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. Daniels, 838 So. 2d 618, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 2003 WL 367084 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amended petition for mandatory injunction shall be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 618, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 2003 WL 367084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-daniels-fladistctapp-2003.