Hawkins v. County of Oneida

79 N.E.2d 458, 297 N.Y. 393, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 847
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 22, 1948·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An action against a county based upon a claim for damages arising out of a defective condition of a highway owing to the negligence of the county or its officers, including an action for wrongfully causing death, may be brought only under section 6 of the County Law. Plaintiff's failure to furnish the sort of notice and claim called for by that section is fatal to the institution of this action. The orders should be reversed, the complaint dismissed, and the question certified answered in the affirmative, with costs in all courts.

Lottghran, Ch. J., Desmond, Thachee and Ftjld, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; Lewis, Conway and Dye, JJ., dissent on the ground that in death actions service of process in compliance with section 6 is not exclusive of the provisions of section 6-a.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins v. County of Oneida, 79 N.E.2d 458, 297 N.Y. 393, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 847 (N.Y. 1948).

79 N.E.2d 458 (Hawkins v. County of Oneida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pastoriza v. State
123 Misc. 2d 481 (New York State Court of Claims, 1984)
Collins v. City of New York
430 N.E.2d 1311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Forero v. Town of Tuxedo
51 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Erickson v. Town of Henderson
30 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)