Hawkins v. City of Richmond

675 F. App'x 327
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-2198·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald E. Hawkins, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss Hawkins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and denying Hawkins’ motion for leave to amend his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hawkins’ informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Hawkins has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s orders. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We thus affirm the district court’s orders. See Hawkins v. City of Richmond, No. 3:16-cv-00216-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins v. City of Richmond, 675 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2017).

675 F. App'x 327 (Hawkins v. City of Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)