Hawkins v. Chandler

13 Del. 434
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMay 15, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Del. 434 (Hawkins v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. Chandler, 13 Del. 434 (Del. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Comegys, C. J.,

charged the jury. To entitle any one to commissions on the sale of real estate, he must have been the agent of the owner of it, and he must have effected the sale of it to the purchaser, or conducted the negotiation of the sale of it to such a stage as to complete the bargain for the sale of it, so far as it depended upon his action and efforts to accomplish the sale of it. But if he renders any efficient services as such agent in bringing about the sale of it afterwards by the owner himself, or by any other agent or broker of his employed by him for the sale of it, and the jury is satisfied from the evidence that he rendered any such efficient [436]*436service in bringing about the sale afterwards so made of the premises to the purchaser, he is entitled, not to the commission on such sale as agent in the sale of it, but to a just and reasonable compensation for such services as the jury may consider them to have been, worth according to the evidence before them.

Verdict for the plaintiff for $25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Del. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-chandler-delsuperct-1889.