Hawkins v. Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC

District of Columbia

Hawkins v. Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 30, 2015·No. Civil Action No. 2014-2024·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) JACQUELINE D. HAWKINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V ) Civil Action No. 14-2024 (RJL) ) CAPITOL PETROLEUM GROUP, et (11., ) ) FILED Defendants. ) JAN an 2015 Clark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jmmw

This matter has come before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 9]. In its December 18, 2014 Order [ECF No. 10], the Court advised plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if she did not respond to the motion by January 16,

2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded.

To date, plaintiff has neither ﬁled an opposition to the motion, nor requested more time to ﬁle her opposition. Further, plaintiff has not advised the Court of any change of address. The Court, therefore, will treat the motion as conceded and will dismiss this action.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

RIC . ON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) JACQUELINE D. HAWKINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V ) Civil Action No. 14-2024 (RJL) ) CAPITOL PETROLEUM GROUP, et (11., ) ) FILED Defendants. ) JAN an 2015 Clark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jmmw

This matter has come before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 9]. In its December 18, 2014 Order [ECF No. 10], the Court advised plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if she did not respond to the motion by January 16,

2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded.

To date, plaintiff has neither ﬁled an opposition to the motion, nor requested more time to ﬁle her opposition. Further, plaintiff has not advised the Court of any change of address. The Court, therefore, will treat the motion as conceded and will dismiss this action.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

RIC . ON United States District Judge

Hawkins v. Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC, (D.D.C. 2015).

Pincite

Hawkins v. Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC (Hawkins v. Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.