Hawkins v. Berdeguez

Fourth Circuit

Hawkins v. Berdeguez

71 F. App'x 261

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2003·No. No. 03-1271·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David and Tracene Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hawkins v. Berdeguez, No. CA-01-47-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David and Tracene Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hawkins v. Berdeguez, No. CA-01-47-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hawkins v. Berdeguez, 71 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

71 F. App'x 261 (Hawkins v. Berdeguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related