Hawkins v. Bayview Loan Servicing
This text of Hawkins v. Bayview Loan Servicing (Hawkins v. Bayview Loan Servicing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Johnny Mack Hawkins, Authorized ) C/A No.: 3:22-1750-SAL-SVH Representative of Willie Mack ) Hawkins, ) )
) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER vs. ) ) Bayview Loan Servicing LLC and ) ) Citifinancial Servicing, Inc., )
) Defendants. )
Johnny Mack Hawkins, “Authorized Representative of Willie Mack Hawkins” (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action against Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Civ. Rule 73.02(B)(2)(e) (D.S.C.), this matter has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff alleges that Willie (“Willie”) Mack Hawkins passed away of natural causes on December 18, 2013. [ECF No. 1 at 4]. While individuals may represent themselves pro se in federal court, a person may not ordinarily appear pro se in the cause of another person or entity. , 113 F.3d 391, 392–93 (2d Cir 1997) (finding that a pro se litigant may not represent a corporation, estate, or partnership); , 509 F.2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975) (“[W]e consider the competence of a layman representing himself to be clearly too limited to allow him to risk the rights of others.”). One exception to the rule prohibiting pro se representation of another
is when a pro se person, who is the executor of an estate, represents the estate and the estate has no creditors or other beneficiaries. ., 88 F. App’x. 659 (4th Cir. 2004) (unpublished) (remanding the matter for further proceedings to ascertain whether there were
any creditors involved); , 474 F.3d 934, 937 (7th Cir. 2007) (finding that where an administrator of an estate is not the sole beneficiary or where the estate has creditors, then the administrator may not represent the estate pro se in federal court).
The complaint indicates “On January 16, 2014, [Johnny] was named Successor Executor in the Last Will and Testament of [Willie’s] estate executed by Willie [] executed May 29, 1997, as firstborn Michael Caruso Hawkins dies on August 23, 2000.” [ECF No. 1 at 4]. However, Plaintiff does not provide any
information concerning the estate’s beneficiaries or creditors. Accordingly, additional information is required to determine if Plaintiff may appear pro se on behalf of the Estate Willie Mack Hawkins. Plaintiff is directed to answer the attached special interrogatories within 21 days from the date of this order.
Plaintiff’s answers should be filed with this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. PP feadger” June 8, 2022 Shiva V. Hodges Columbia, South Carolina United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Johnny Mack Hawkins, Authorized ) C/A No.: 3:22-1750-SAL-SVH Representative of Willie Mack ) Hawkins, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Plaintiff’s Answers To The Court’s vs. ) Special Interogatorries ) Bayview Loan Servicing LLC and ) Citifinancial Servicing, Inc., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )
Plaintiff indicates he was appointed Executor of the Estate of Willie Mack Hawkins (“The Estate”) on January 16, 2014. [ECF No. 1 at 4]. To determine if Plaintiff may represent the Hawkins Estate pro se, Plaintiff shall answer the following questions as completely as possible in the space provided. If additional space is needed, attach a separate sheet of paper to this form and indicate which answers are continued on the separate sheet.
1. Provide the Fairfield County probate case number for the Estate. _________________________________________________ 2. Are you a beneficiary of the Estate?________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 3. Are there any other beneficiaries of the Estate? If so, please provides those beneficiaries names and address._________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 4. Are there any creditors of the Estate? If so, please provide those creditors names and address._______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff is directed to attach to these interrogatories a copy of any orders or letters from the Fairfield County Probate Court. .
Signed this ______ day of _______________, 2022.
___________________________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hawkins v. Bayview Loan Servicing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-bayview-loan-servicing-scd-2022.