Hawkins, Romelle Monte v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 2015
DocketPD-0084-15
StatusPublished

This text of Hawkins, Romelle Monte v. State (Hawkins, Romelle Monte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins, Romelle Monte v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NO. OI-l'J-ft#)-f,ft

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

ROMELLE HAWKINS, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW ROMELLE HAWKINS, Petioner, and files this motion for an extension

of time in which to file his petition for discretionary review. In support of this motion,

Petitioner shows the court the following:

I

This appeal lies from the Petitioner's conviction in The State of Texas v. Komelle

Hawkins which was affirmed by the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-14-00145-

CR on December 4, 2014. This is Petitioner's first request for an extension to file the

petition for discretionary review.

II

REClfWflfr is Presently incarcerated in TDCJ and receivedrteRQ?¥M 3URT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS I/HIMINAL APPE

jan 2i 2o,5 JAN2320,S Abel Acosta, Clerk Abel Acosta, Clerk ••*•• !

opinion on the 2R. day of lyW.f.iTlbf >f» 2014. Petitioner needs additional time to review the Court of Appeals opinion and prepare his petition for discretionary

review.

This request is not made for delay but so justice may be done

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays the court grant this motion and extend the

deadline for filing the petition for discretionary review.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/^>l\^4i/n/S) Romelle Hawkins TDCJ# 1911528

Petitioner

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

instrument has been delivered to the Harris County District Attorney by epositing

same in the U.S. Mail on the 2Jj- day of 1)p/Afl\LY)^ .20 lL- I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

instrument has been delivered to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 12405,

Austin, Texas 78711 by U.S. mail this the 2l day of Qf-CrMnhfi& .20 W.

Romelle Hawkins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hawkins, Romelle Monte v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-romelle-monte-v-state-texapp-2015.