Hawkins, Ex Parte Chris Turan

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 5, 2010
DocketAP-76,342
StatusPublished

This text of Hawkins, Ex Parte Chris Turan (Hawkins, Ex Parte Chris Turan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins, Ex Parte Chris Turan, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,342




EX PARTE CHRIS TURAN HAWKINS, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1112966 IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to thirty five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hawkins v. State, No. 14-07-00381-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] delivered September 25, 2008).

            Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to timely advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to timely advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-07-00381-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 1112966 from the 232nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: May 5, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hawkins, Ex Parte Chris Turan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-ex-parte-chris-turan-texcrimapp-2010.