Hawkes v. Davis

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 15-JUL-2026 01:46 PM Dkt. 44 ODMR

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

BEAU HAWKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHELSEA DAVIS; HAWAIʻI NEWS NOW, Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 2CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Beau Hawkes's (Hawkes) July 10, 2026 "Motion for Reconsideration of July 10, 2026 Dismissal Order and for Relief From Default Under HRAP Rules 40 and 26(b)," which is construed as a motion for reconsideration (Motion), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that Hawkes fails to demonstrate a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in the NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

July 10, 2026 Order Dismissing Appeal. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 15, 2026. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge