Hawk v. Thorn
This text of 54 Barb. 164 (Hawk v. Thorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objections raised in' this case are not tenable. When a person has unlawfully taken possession of another’s property, the tort may be waived, and an action brought for its value. Such a cause of action is [169]*169assignable. Both causes of action set forth in the complaint are founded on contract, the first express, and the other implied by law, and are properly joined.
The order below was right, and should be affirmed with costs.
The demurrer was properly disposed of. The complaint shows that both causes of- action arose on contract. They could therefore be properly assigned.
Judgment should be given for the plaintiff, with costs.
Clerke, P. J., concurred.
Order affirmed.
Clerke, Cardozo and Geo. G. Barnard, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Barb. 164, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawk-v-thorn-nysupct-1869.