Hawk v. State

963 So. 2d 929, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2007 WL 2456198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2007·No. No. 5D06-2076·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Roberts v. State, 923 So.2d 578, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“A mistrial is warranted only when an error is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”); Waldo v. State, 728 So.2d 280, 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed on other [930] grounds, 759 So.2d 674 (Fla.2000) (holding nature of force used was deadly as matter of law).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawk v. State, 963 So. 2d 929, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2007 WL 2456198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

963 So. 2d 929 (Hawk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newton v. State
963 So. 2d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)