Hawk v. State

963 So. 2d 929, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2007 WL 2456198
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 2007
DocketNo. 5D06-2076
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 So. 2d 929 (Hawk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawk v. State, 963 So. 2d 929, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2007 WL 2456198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Roberts v. State, 923 So.2d 578, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“A mistrial is warranted only when an error is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”); Waldo v. State, 728 So.2d 280, 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed on other [930]*930grounds, 759 So.2d 674 (Fla.2000) (holding nature of force used was deadly as matter of law).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newton v. State
963 So. 2d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
963 So. 2d 929, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2007 WL 2456198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawk-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.