Hawk v. Pine Lumber Co.

62 S.E. 754, 149 N.C. 16, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hawk v. Pine Lumber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 N.C. 48
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 1908·Published

Opinion

*17 Walker, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, from 'the refusal of the Court to grant a new trial, because the Court refused to give the jury, as requested to do so by bis counsel, the following instruction: “Upon the whole evidence," you will answer the eighth issue ‘Yes.’ ” The issues are set out in the plaintiff’s appeal and reference is made thereto'. The request was not in proper form, as it deprived the jury of the right to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses. Mfg. Co. v. R. R., 128 N. C., at pp. 284, 285, and cases cited; Merrell v. Dudley, 139 N. C., 57. The burden of the eighth issue was upon the defendant.

Eut we’ will not decide the case upon the inaccurate and disapproved form of the prayer. If we did so, it would affirm the judgment in this appeal. In the plaintiffs 'appeal we have directed a now trial, as to all the issues, and this appeal^ therefore, becomes unnecessary, for the defendant will get what it is asking for by our giving a new trial in that appeal. Therefore, the proper course now is to dismiss this appeal;

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawk v. Pine Lumber Co., 62 S.E. 754, 149 N.C. 16, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 288 (N.C. 1908).

62 S.E. 754 (Hawk v. Pine Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrell v. Dudley.
51 S.E. 777 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)