Hawk v. Pennsylvania Railroad
11 A. 459, 7 Sadler 212, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 739
Opinion
After a careful examination of this case, we have failed to discover any evidence tending to show such negligence on part of the defendant or its employees as would render it liable for the plaintiff’s injuries; we must, therefore, concur with the court below in its rulings.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawk v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 11 A. 459, 7 Sadler 212, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 739 (Pa. 1887).
11 A. 459 (Hawk v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Repyneck v. Tarantino
202 A.2d 105 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Lynch v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.
116 N.W. 983 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Britton v. Central Union Telephone Co.
131 F. 844 (Sixth Circuit, 1904)
Rogen v. Enoch Morgan's Sons' Co.
1 N.Y.S. 273 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1888)