Hawes v. Superior Pine Products Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hawes v. Superior Pine Products Co.

169 S.E.2d 126, 225 Ga. 392, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 506

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1969

Docket25155

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 S.E.2d 126 (Hawes v. Superior Pine Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawes v. Superior Pine Products Co., 169 S.E.2d 126, 225 Ga. 392, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 506 (Ga. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

Certiorari was granted in the present case to dispose of the contention of the applicant that the Court of Appeals had refused to follow the decision of this court in [393]*393Superior Pine Products Co. v. Williams, 214 Ga. 485 (106 SE2d 6), which case involved the same contract dealt with by the Court of Appeals in the present case. However, the present case involves different taxable years, an amendment to the contract, as well as an amendment to the revenue laws (Ga. L. 1960, p. 117; Code Ann. § 92-3119 (e) (8)), enacted after the prior decision of this court. The amendment to the revenue laws, supra, adopted the language of subsection (K) of § 117 of the Federal Revenue Code of 1939 (now § 631) and requires the result reached by the Court of Appeals.

Argued June 11, 1969 Decided July 10, 1969. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, William L. Harper, H. Perry Michael, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. Tillman, Brice, McTier & Coleman, B. Lamar Tillman, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Undercover, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Justice.

Certiorari was granted in the present case to dispose of the contention of the applicant that the Court of Appeals had refused to follow the decision of this court in [393]*393Superior Pine Products Co. v. Williams, 214 Ga. 485 (106 SE2d 6), which case involved the same contract dealt with by the Court of Appeals in the present case. However, the present case involves different taxable years, an amendment to the contract, as well as an amendment to the revenue laws (Ga. L. 1960, p. 117; Code Ann. § 92-3119 (e) (8)), enacted after the prior decision of this court. The amendment to the revenue laws, supra, adopted the language of subsection (K) of § 117 of the Federal Revenue Code of 1939 (now § 631) and requires the result reached by the Court of Appeals.

Argued June 11, 1969 Decided July 10, 1969. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, William L. Harper, H. Perry Michael, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. Tillman, Brice, McTier & Coleman, B. Lamar Tillman, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Undercover, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.E.2d 126, 225 Ga. 392, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawes-v-superior-pine-products-co-ga-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack