Hawes v. Southern Concrete Industries, Inc.

208 So. 2d 637, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1968·No. No. 67-198·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ALLEN Judge.

The appellees in this case were defendants, together with the Seaboard Air Line [638]*638Railroad Company, in the case of Mark Hawes v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, et al, filed in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida. In that case the jury returned a verdict favorable to Mark Hawes against the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, but held all the other defendants, appellees here, not guilty.

We concluded in our opinion filed in Case No. 67-226, Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Hawes, Fla.App., 208 So.2d 634, that the judgment should be affirmed as it was a factual situation for the jury to decide.

We necessarily conclude that it was a factual situation in this case also and affirm the case without further opinion.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawes v. Southern Concrete Industries, Inc., 208 So. 2d 637, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

208 So. 2d 637 (Hawes v. Southern Concrete Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Hawes
208 So. 2d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)