Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris

Supreme Court

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris

510 U.S. 1083, 114 S. Ct. 908

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 21, 1994·No. 92-2058·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether the Hawaii Supreme Court erred in concluding that respondent’s state law wrongful discharge claims were not preempted by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U. S. C. §151 et seq.” Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is- to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether the Hawaii Supreme Court erred in concluding that respondent’s state law wrongful discharge claims were not preempted by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U. S. C. §151 et seq.” Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is- to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29 does not apply.

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris, 510 U.S. 1083, 114 S. Ct. 908 (1994).

Pincite

510 U.S. 1083 (Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related