Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris
This text of 510 U.S. 1083 (Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris and Finazzo v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether the Hawaii Supreme Court erred in concluding that respondent’s state law wrongful discharge claims were not preempted by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U. S. C. §151 et seq.” Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is- to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29 does not apply.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 U.S. 1083, 114 S. Ct. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawaiian-airlines-inc-v-norris-and-finazzo-v-norris-scotus-1994.