Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 22, 2013
DocketSCPW-13-0000053
StatusPublished

This text of Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board (Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board, (haw 2013).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000053 22-FEB-2013 02:05 PM

SCPW-13-0000053

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

HAWAI#I STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,

and

HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; JAMES B. NICHOLSON, CHAIRPERSON, HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; and ROCK B. LEY, MEMBER, HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (2013-003), Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (HLRB CASE NO. CE-05-781)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the January 28, 2013 petition for

a writ of mandamus filed by the Hawai#i State Teachers

Association (“HSTA”), the documents attached thereto and

submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that, at

this time, the HSTA is not entitled to the requested mandamus

relief in light of the voluminous record, the extended duration

of the proceedings, and other relevant circumstances concerning

the disposition of other prohibited practices cases before the

Hawai#i Labor Relations Board. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i

200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action); In re Disciplinary Bd., 94 Hawai#i

363, 368 & 371, 984 P.2d 688, 693 & 695 (1999) (mandamus relief

is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly

owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and

certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly

prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is

available). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 22, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Gary W.B. Chang

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court
984 P.2d 688 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawaii-state-teachers-association-and-hawaii-labor-haw-2013.