Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co.
93 N.Y.S. 1134
Opinion
In our opinion the plaintiff made out a prima facie case, which cast upon the defendant the necessity of explaining the circumstances, and showing that neither it nor its servants had been negligent. Guldseth v. Carlin, 19 App. Div. 588, 46 N. Y. Supp. 357. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co., 93 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
93 N.Y.S. 1134 (Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guldseth v. Carlin
19 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)