Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co.

93 N.Y.S. 1134

This text of 93 N.Y.S. 1134 (Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Havikin v. Thomas & Buckley Hod Elevator Co., 93 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

SCOTT, P. J.

In our opinion the plaintiff made out a prima facie case, which cast upon the defendant the necessity of explaining the circumstances, and showing that neither it nor its servants had been negligent. Guldseth v. Carlin, 19 App. Div. 588, 46 N. Y. Supp. 357. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guldseth v. Carlin
19 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/havikin-v-thomas-buckley-hod-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1905.