Haviaris v. 25 Broadway Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haviaris v. 25 Broadway Corp.

121 A.D.2d 352, 503 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 352 (Haviaris v. 25 Broadway Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haviaris v. 25 Broadway Corp., 121 A.D.2d 352, 503 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred M. Ascione, J.), entered on November 8, 1985, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiffs, Douglas Haviaris and Despina Haviaris, within 20 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to a reduction of the verdict in their favor to $1,100,000 and $100,000, respectively, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred M. Ascione, J.), entered on November 8, 1985, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiffs, Douglas Haviaris and Despina Haviaris, within 20 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to a reduction of the verdict in their favor to $1,100,000 and $100,000, respectively, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 352, 503 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haviaris-v-25-broadway-corp-nyappdiv-1986.