Havey v. Hofman

199 A. 75, 123 N.J. Eq. 590, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 685
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 11, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis and reported in 121 N. J. Eq. 523.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Havey v. Hofman, 199 A. 75, 123 N.J. Eq. 590, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 685 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

199 A. 75 (Havey v. Hofman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yacker v. Weiner
263 A.2d 188 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)