Haverty v. State

830 So. 2d 264, 2002 WL 31525301
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2002·No. 5D02-2629·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

830 So.2d 264 (2002)

William D. HAVERTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D02-2629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 15, 2002.

William D. Haverty, Chipley, pro se.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of an order denying Rule 3.800(a) relief, the State concedes that the trial judge did not have the authority to render the order being appealed, having previously recused himself from the appellant's underlying case. Therefore, we vacate the order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence and remand the case to the trial court for reassignment. *265 See Meaweather v. State, 732 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHARP, W., HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haverty v. State, 830 So. 2d 264, 2002 WL 31525301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

830 So. 2d 264 (Haverty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goolsby v. State
914 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Davis v. State
849 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)