Haverty Furniture Co. v. Lyon-Young Printing Co.

139 S.E. 921, 37 Ga. App. 263, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 616
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 4, 1927·No. 18141·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The principle announced in All Church Press v. Harris Advertising Agency, 36 Ga. App. 616 (138 S. E. 85), is controlling in this case, and the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See Cooley v. Moss, 123 Ga. 707 (51 S. E. 625); Morrow v. Southern Empress Co., 101 Ga. 810 (28 S. E. 998); Bashinski v. Lake, 9 Ga. App. 352 (71 S. E. 702); Martin v. Cox, 13 Ga. App. 236 (79 S. E. 39); Manget v. Gariton, 34 Ga. App. 556 (3) (130 S. E. 604).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Lillie, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, for plaintiff in error. Hewlett & Dennis,, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haverty Furniture Co. v. Lyon-Young Printing Co., 139 S.E. 921, 37 Ga. App. 263, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

139 S.E. 921 (Haverty Furniture Co. v. Lyon-Young Printing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mion & Murray Co. v. World Wide Pictures Inc.
176 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)