Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts/Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.

Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.

47 F. 219, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1412
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedAugust 6, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 47 F. 219 (Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co., 47 F. 219, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1412 (circtdma 1891).

Opinion

Nelson, J.

The first claim of the Floyd patent. No. 867,280, for a sliding hill constructed in spiral form, and terminating ata point immediately below the starting point, involves no element of novelty or invention, and is therefore invalid for want of patentability. A decree is to be entered dismissing the plaintiff’s bill, with costs. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 F. 219, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haverhill-roller-toboggan-co-v-automatic-roller-toboggan-co-circtdma-1891.