Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts/Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.

Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.

47 F. 219, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1412
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided August 6, 1891·Published

Opinion

Nelson, J.

The first claim of the Floyd patent. No. 867,280, for a sliding hill constructed in spiral form, and terminating ata point immediately below the starting point, involves no element of novelty or invention, and is therefore invalid for want of patentability. A decree is to be entered dismissing the plaintiff’s bill, with costs. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co., 47 F. 219, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1412 (circtdma 1891).

47 F. 219 (Haverhill Roller Toboggan Co. v. Automatic Roller Toboggan Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.