Haverhill Box Board Co. v. Coy, Hunt & Co.

95 N.Y.S. 1134
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 24, 1905·Published

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

Upon their admissions made at the trial, recovery for goods manufactured and delivered was properly awarded against the defendants, who, having the affirmative on their counterclaim for failure to fill certain other orders, by introducing depositions taken on plaintiff’s behalf of witnesses whom they specifically adopted as their own, offered sufficient to sustain the finding by the learned trial justice that such unfilled orders were accepted only conditionally. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haverhill Box Board Co. v. Coy, Hunt & Co., 95 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

95 N.Y.S. 1134 (Haverhill Box Board Co. v. Coy, Hunt & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.