Havens v. State Beverage Department

16 Fla. Supp. 67
Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County·Decided April 13, 1960·No. No. 60 L 578·Published

Opinion

ROBERT H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

On November 12, 1959, the District Court of Appeal of the Third District of Florida, in State Beverage Department v. Emal, Inc., 115 So. 2d 566, reversed the order of a circuit judge of this county granting certiorari and quashing a suspension order of the director of the state beverage department because, it said, a circuit court was not free to weigh or evaluate evidence which had been presented to the director, but was charged only with the duty to examine the record and determine whether the director’s order was in accord with essential requirements of law and whether the director had before him competent substantial evidence to support his findings and conclusions.

Applying that rule in the instant case, the court has examined the record and determined that the director had before him competent substantial evidence to support his findings and conclusions.

[68] Accordingly, the motion of the state beverage department and the director thereof to' quash the petition for certiorari is granted and the petition is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Havens v. State Beverage Department, 16 Fla. Supp. 67 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1960).

16 Fla. Supp. 67 (Havens v. State Beverage Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc.
115 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)