Havens v. Havens

215 A.D. 756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 215 A.D. 756 (Havens v. Havens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Havens v. Havens, 215 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts, upon the ground that Mary J. Brady did not intend to transfer to Carrie B. Havens any interest in the account which should be operative during her lifetime; she intended to exercise sole dominion over the fund so long as she lived; that her intent was merely testamentary. Present — ■ Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roe v. Meeker
283 P.2d 989 (Washington Supreme Court, 1955)
In Re Green's Estate
283 P.2d 989 (Washington Supreme Court, 1955)
In re the Estate of Jagodzinska
272 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
In re the Estate of Jarmakowski
169 Misc. 463 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
McDermott v. Bennett
253 A.D. 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Brumer v. Brumer
223 A.D. 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Lofmark
131 Misc. 188 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1928)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Sanders
129 Misc. 780 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1927)
Claim of Houston v. Brown
217 A.D. 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Scanlan v. Meehan
216 A.D. 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/havens-v-havens-nyappdiv-1925.