Havens v. Havens
This text of 215 A.D. 756 (Havens v. Havens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts, upon the ground that Mary J. Brady did not intend to transfer to Carrie B. Havens any interest in the account which should be operative during her lifetime; she intended to exercise sole dominion over the fund so long as she lived; that her intent was merely testamentary. Present — ■ Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/havens-v-havens-nyappdiv-1925.