Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 7, 2015
Docket14-15-00397-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court (Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00397-CV

HAVEN CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Appellant

V. WILLIAM MICHAEL LEEBRON II, E.J. KING AND BRAZORIA COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 62845A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed March 30, 2015. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On May 27, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On May 15, 2015, appellees filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction in which they argue the judgment is not final because it does not dispose of all parties and all claims. Because appellant has failed to file a clerk’s record in this appeal, we cannot determine whether the judgment is final. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205–06 (Tex. 2001) (“To determine whether an order disposes of all pending claims and parties, it may of course be necessary for the appellate court to look to the record in the case”).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haven-chapel-united-methodist-church-v-william-mic-texapp-2015.