Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court
This text of Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court (Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-15-00397-CV
HAVEN CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Appellant
V. WILLIAM MICHAEL LEEBRON II, E.J. KING AND BRAZORIA COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, Appellees
On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 62845A
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed March 30, 2015. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
On May 27, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
On May 15, 2015, appellees filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction in which they argue the judgment is not final because it does not dispose of all parties and all claims. Because appellant has failed to file a clerk’s record in this appeal, we cannot determine whether the judgment is final. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205–06 (Tex. 2001) (“To determine whether an order disposes of all pending claims and parties, it may of course be necessary for the appellate court to look to the record in the case”).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Haven Chapel United Methodist Church v. William Michael Leebron II, E.J. King and Brazoria County Commissioner's Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haven-chapel-united-methodist-church-v-william-mic-texapp-2015.