Havel v. Villa St. Joseph
940 N.E.2d 985, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530
This text of 940 N.E.2d 985 (Havel v. Villa St. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 940 N.E.2d 985, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530 (Ohio 2011).
Opinion
Cuyahoga App. No. 94677, 2010-Ohio-5251. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed November 22, 2010:
“Whether R.C. 2315.21(B), as amended by S.B. 80, effective April 7, 2005, is unconstitutional, in violation of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, because it is a procedural law that conflicts with Civ.R. 42(B).”
The conflict case is Hanners v. Ho Wah Gentling Wire & Cable, Franklin App. No. 09AP-361, 2009-Ohio-6481.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fleenor v. Karr
2011 Ohio 5706 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.
2011 Ohio 2389 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
940 N.E.2d 985, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/havel-v-villa-st-joseph-ohio-2011.