Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land Department

840 P.2d 1024, 173 Ariz. 159, 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 384, 1992 WL 334063

Opinion

ORDER

The motion for reconsideration filed by the appellees was considered by the court. The court has been informed by appellants that it will not file a response. The court finds that the motion is well taken. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of this court is directed to strike from this court’s opinion, [158 Ariz. 552, 764 P.2d 37,] the [last] full paragraph on page [558 of 158 Ariz., page 43 of 764 P.2d] beginning with the sentence “Secondly, the lease in Alamo did not contain a ‘termination upon condemnation’ provision” and ending with the sentence, “Thus, the state could not include such a provision in its lease with Alamo Cattle Co.”