Havas v. Atlantic Insurance
Opinion
OPINION
On this appeal the appellants claim that the district court failed to award them money damages proven to have been sustained as a result of a theft of personal property from their home. The insurance policy limited liability to an amount not exceeding what it would cost to repair or replace the'property [416]*416with material of like kind and quality. The stolen items were replaced. With this limitation in mind the court based its damage award upon the value of the replaced items for which the appellants had documentary proof. We find no error in the court’s determination of damages. Roswell Trailers, Inc. v. Potomac Ins. Co., 576 P.2d 1133 (N.M. 1978).
Affirmed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
596 P.2d 246 (Havas v. Atlantic Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.