Havard v. State

78 S.W.2d 624, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 587
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 1935
DocketNo. 17153
StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.W.2d 624 (Havard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Havard v. State, 78 S.W.2d 624, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 587 (Tex. 1935).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for- the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The phase of the indictment upon which the judgment rests is that charging that appellant, “in the County of Angelina and State of. Texas, did then and there unlawfully manufacture intoxicating liquor against the peace and dignity of the State.”

The indictment is insufficient to charge an offense. It is subject to the same vice as that discussed in the case of Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Offield v. State
75 S.W.2d 882 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.W.2d 624, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/havard-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.