Haut v. Rossbach
17 A.2d 165, 128 N.J. Eq. 478
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported at 128 N. J. Eq. 77.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haut v. Rossbach, 17 A.2d 165, 128 N.J. Eq. 478 (N.J. 1941).
17 A.2d 165 (Haut v. Rossbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Subcarrier Communications, Inc. v. Day
691 A.2d 876 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
AYR Composition, Inc. v. Rosenberg
619 A.2d 592 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Rubel & Jensen Corp. v. Rubel
203 A.2d 625 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.
182 A.2d 387 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Renpak, Inc. v. Oppenheimer
104 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
National Tile Board Corp. v. Panelboard Mfg. Co., Inc.
99 A.2d 440 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Sun Dial Corp. v. Rideout
96 A.2d 788 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Abalene Exterminating Co. of N.J., Inc. v. Elges
43 A.2d 165 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)