Hauss v. State
819 So. 2d 987, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8776, 2002 WL 1370009
Opinion
Robert Hauss, (the Appellant), appeals his sentence imposed as a result of his conviction and adjudication of guilt for multiple counts of D.U.I. The Appellant argues that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence.
The State has conceded error in this case. Therefore, we affirm the Appellant’s conviction, but remand to the trial court to enter a written order conforming to the trial judge’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cheshire v. State, 568 So.2d 908, 913 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hauss v. State, 819 So. 2d 987, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8776, 2002 WL 1370009 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
819 So. 2d 987 (Hauss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cheshire v. State
568 So. 2d 908 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)