Hauss v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hauss v. State

819 So. 2d 987, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8776, 2002 WL 1370009

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 2002

DocketNos. 4D01-740, 4D01-1860

StatusPublished

This text of 819 So. 2d 987 (Hauss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hauss v. State, 819 So. 2d 987, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8776, 2002 WL 1370009 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hauss, (the Appellant), appeals his sentence imposed as a result of his conviction and adjudication of guilt for multiple counts of D.U.I. The Appellant argues that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence.

The State has conceded error in this case. Therefore, we affirm the Appellant’s conviction, but remand to the trial court to enter a written order conforming to the trial judge’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cheshire v. State, 568 So.2d 908, 913 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI