Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.

258 A.D. 851, 16 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As we read the pleadings, it wifi be open to the plaintiff to prove under the existing complaint ah that he sets forth in the proposed amended complaint. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in an action for damages sustained by reason of contracting silicosis.) Present—Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As we read the pleadings, it wifi be open to the plaintiff to prove under the existing complaint ah that he sets forth in the proposed amended complaint. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in an action for damages sustained by reason of contracting silicosis.) Present—Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Hauss v. Rochester Button Co., 258 A.D. 851, 16 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 851 (Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.