Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.

258 A.D. 851, 16 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 851 (Hauss v. Rochester Button Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hauss v. Rochester Button Co., 258 A.D. 851, 16 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As we read the pleadings, it wifi be open to the plaintiff to prove under the existing complaint ah that he sets forth in the proposed amended complaint. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in an action for damages sustained by reason of contracting silicosis.) Present—Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As we read the pleadings, it wifi be open to the plaintiff to prove under the existing complaint ah that he sets forth in the proposed amended complaint. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in an action for damages sustained by reason of contracting silicosis.) Present—Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 851, 16 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauss-v-rochester-button-co-nyappdiv-1939.