Hausmann v. L.M.

837 So. 2d 399, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 3, 2003 WL 60976
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 2003
DocketNo. SC01-2749
StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 399 (Hausmann v. L.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hausmann v. L.M., 837 So. 2d 399, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 3, 2003 WL 60976 (Fla. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Hausmann ex rel. Doe v. L.M, 806 So.2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have [400]*400determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hausmann Ex Rel. Doe v. LM
806 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 399, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 3, 2003 WL 60976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hausmann-v-lm-fla-2003.