Hausmann v. L.M.

Supreme Court of Florida

Hausmann v. L.M.

837 So. 2d 399, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 3, 2003 WL 60976

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 9, 2003·No. No. SC01-2749·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Hausmann ex rel. Doe v. L.M, 806 So.2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have [400]*400determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Hausmann ex rel. Doe v. L.M, 806 So.2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have [400]*400determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur.

Hausmann v. L.M., 837 So. 2d 399, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 3, 2003 WL 60976 (Fla. 2003).

Pincite

837 So. 2d 399 (Hausmann v. L.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related