Hausman v. Steiner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hausman v. Steiner

171 Misc. 676, 13 N.Y.S.2d 567

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 171 Misc. 676 (Hausman v. Steiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hausman v. Steiner, 171 Misc. 676, 13 N.Y.S.2d 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order directing the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of plaintiff, judgment creditor, was unauthorized in view of the fact that execution had not been returned unsatisfied at the time of the making of said order, as required by subdivision ] of section 684 of the Civil Practice Act. The movant, as a junior garnishee lienor, has an interest which entitles him to apply for a vacatur of the order permitting the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of the respondent. (See Matter of Royal Bank, 140 App. Div. 480.) The garnishee execution was properly issued to the city marshal.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — Frankenthaler, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order directing the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of plaintiff, judgment creditor, was unauthorized in view of the fact that execution had not been returned unsatisfied at the time of the making of said order, as required by subdivision ] of section 684 of the Civil Practice Act. The movant, as a junior garnishee lienor, has an interest which entitles him to apply for a vacatur of the order permitting the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of the respondent. (See Matter of Royal Bank, 140 App. Div. 480.) The garnishee execution was properly issued to the city marshal.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — Frankenthaler, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Misc. 676, 13 N.Y.S.2d 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hausman-v-steiner-nyappterm-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack