Hausman v. Hartog

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hausman v. Hartog

371 So. 2d 1036, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17307

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1978·No. No. 76-2051·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment reinstating the classification of 80 acres of [1037]*1037appellee’s property as agricultural. We find no error in the final judgment as to the classification of a 25 acre orange grove located on the appellee’s property. Roden v. K & K Land Management, Inc., 368 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1978). However, there is no evidence to support an agricultural classification for the remaining 55 acres of vacant land owned by the appellee. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions that further proceedings be conducted in accordance with this opinion.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment reinstating the classification of 80 acres of [1037]*1037appellee’s property as agricultural. We find no error in the final judgment as to the classification of a 25 acre orange grove located on the appellee’s property. Roden v. K & K Land Management, Inc., 368 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1978). However, there is no evidence to support an agricultural classification for the remaining 55 acres of vacant land owned by the appellee. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions that further proceedings be conducted in accordance with this opinion.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Hausman v. Hartog, 371 So. 2d 1036, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17307 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

371 So. 2d 1036 (Hausman v. Hartog) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related