Hausman v. Hartog

371 So. 2d 1036, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17307
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 1978
DocketNo. 76-2051
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 371 So. 2d 1036 (Hausman v. Hartog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hausman v. Hartog, 371 So. 2d 1036, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17307 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment reinstating the classification of 80 acres of [1037]*1037appellee’s property as agricultural. We find no error in the final judgment as to the classification of a 25 acre orange grove located on the appellee’s property. Roden v. K & K Land Management, Inc., 368 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1978). However, there is no evidence to support an agricultural classification for the remaining 55 acres of vacant land owned by the appellee. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions that further proceedings be conducted in accordance with this opinion.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bystrom v. Union Land Inv., Inc.
477 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 So. 2d 1036, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hausman-v-hartog-fladistctapp-1978.