Hauskins v. McGillicuddy

Arizona Supreme Court

Hauskins v. McGillicuddy

867 P.2d 849, 177 Ariz. 279, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 13

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 14, 1994

DocketNo. CV-93-0009-PR

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 P.2d 849 (Hauskins v. McGillicuddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hauskins v. McGillicuddy, 867 P.2d 849, 177 Ariz. 279, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 13 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[280]*280ORDER

Review of Issue No. 2 was granted on June 15, 1993, and the case was argued to the Court on January 13, 1994.

Having heard argument, and reviewed the record, briefs, and memoranda, the Court notes that, at oral argument, Plaintiffs concede that on remand Defendant is entitled to a hearing on the issues described in United Services Automobile Association v. Morris, 154 Ariz. 113, 741 P.2d 246 (1987), notwithstanding language to the contrary in the Court of Appeals’ opinion. The Court notes further that the statute, A.R.S. § 12-821, has been repealed effective July 17, 1993. Thus, the Court concludes that review would now be improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.

MOELLER, V.C.J., and ZLAKET, J., dissent from this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[280]*280ORDER

Review of Issue No. 2 was granted on June 15, 1993, and the case was argued to the Court on January 13, 1994.

Having heard argument, and reviewed the record, briefs, and memoranda, the Court notes that, at oral argument, Plaintiffs concede that on remand Defendant is entitled to a hearing on the issues described in United Services Automobile Association v. Morris, 154 Ariz. 113, 741 P.2d 246 (1987), notwithstanding language to the contrary in the Court of Appeals’ opinion. The Court notes further that the statute, A.R.S. § 12-821, has been repealed effective July 17, 1993. Thus, the Court concludes that review would now be improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.

MOELLER, V.C.J., and ZLAKET, J., dissent from this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 P.2d 849, 177 Ariz. 279, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauskins-v-mcgillicuddy-ariz-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack