Hauser v. Pruitt

35 A.D.3d 740, 824 N.Y.S.2d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2006·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for a writ of habeas corpus, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Christopher, J.), dated September 21, 2005, which, upon consent, inter alia, awarded sole legal custody of the children to the father.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed because the mother is not aggrieved by the order of custody entered upon her consent (see Matter of Jonathan G., 278 AD2d 324, 325 [2000]; Lewis v Lewis, 269 AD2d 429 [2000]). To the extent that the mother argues that her consent was not valid, her remedy is to seek vacatur of the order (see Matter of Polyak v Toyber, 2 AD3d 642, 643 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hauser v. Pruitt, 35 A.D.3d 740, 824 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

35 A.D.3d 740 (Hauser v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
142 A.D.3d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
BROWN, JOHN W., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Brown
125 A.D.3d 1380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re Beverly R.
38 A.D.3d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)