Hauser v. Coates

478 So. 2d 518, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2617, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 20, 1985
DocketNo. 85-2290
StatusPublished

This text of 478 So. 2d 518 (Hauser v. Coates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hauser v. Coates, 478 So. 2d 518, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2617, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari is granted. The trial court’s order disqualifying a law firm from representing itself in a declaratory judgment action brought to interpret a contract between the parties is quashed. See Munne v. Garcia, 414 So.2d 1099 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Kahn v. Milon, 332 So.2d 149 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); § 454.18, Fla.Stat. (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kahn v. Milon
332 So. 2d 149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Munne v. Garcia
414 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 So. 2d 518, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2617, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 5912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauser-v-coates-fladistctapp-1985.